Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniel Dunigan and John Berry
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 8, 1989No. 88-2788, 88-2817PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Chief Judge.
The appellants in this case are two civilians who were found by a jury to have participated in a surgical strike upon a supply building at the Glenview Naval Air Station: the objective of the mission was to steal factory sealed air conditioners being stored there. After a three day trial, the jury found Dunigan and Berry guilty of conspiring to steal the air conditioners, entering a United States building with intent to commit a theft, and knowingly converting United States property for their own use. We affirm.
I. Background
In the early morning hours of November 22, 1983, a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- United States v. Mandell Jackson, Joseph Davis, and Romano GinesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Joseph Pace, Anthony Besase, Christ Savides, Donald Smith, John Cialoni, and Robert WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Daniel L. BalzanoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Kevin O. Depriest and Steve MorrellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Scott SophieCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.