Legal Opinion
Proctor & Gamble Paper Products Co. v. Yeargin Construction Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 3, 1990No. A90A0094PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Beasley, Judge.
McDowell, an employee of Yeargin Construction Company, was injured while working as a welder at Proctor & Gamble’s (P&G) plant. McDowell sued P&G for failure to properly maintain its premises. P&G filed a third party complaint against Yeargin seeking indemnification pursuant to the contract between them. Yeargin won summary judgment.
The indemnification clause states: “Seller [Yeargin] agrees to protect, defend, indemnify and save Buyer [P&G] harmless from any and all judgments, . . . settlements and claims on account of . . . personal injury, . . . which may be sustained by . .…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Meade v. HeimansonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Holiday Inns, Inc. v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Binswanger Glass Co. v. Beers Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. DolceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Willis v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hoffman v. Atlanta Gas Light Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Georgia Ports Authority v. Southeast Atlantic Cargo OperatorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- NATIONAL GYPSUM OF GA. v. Ploof Carriers Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004