Legal Opinion

Harold Thomas Hermansen Alias Ford Hermansen v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 23, 1956No. 15569PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

On motion for rehearing the appellant urges strongly that since, as he argues, the purchasers of automobiles from him under Texas law obtained good title thereto, prevailing over the claims of the Radcliff Finance Corporation, there was no fraud in his use of the mails to obtain duplicate Texas certificates of title for them. This argument presupposes that 18 U.S.C.A. § 1341 requires the consummation of a fraudulent scheme, while quite the opposite is true. The statute provides:

“Whoever, having devised or intended to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud * * * for the purpose of executing…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. CalwerDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Lloyd DIXON, Jr., AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  2. Howard A. Blachly and Robert L. McMillen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  3. Marshall T. Gregory v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  4. United States v. Robert L. StraussCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  5. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Lloyd DIXON, Jr., AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API