Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Werner
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 23, 1924No. 11533PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
The proceeding in Habeas Corpus came before WILSON, J., Charleston, October, 1922, and the motion before BOWMAN, J., November, 1922. Affirmed in part and reversed in part. The decree of Circuit Judge Wilson follows:
"This matter comes before me upon a petition and affidavits and rule to show cause as to why the said infant, Mary Elizabeth Doran, should not be removed from the custody of its father, Charles F. Doran, and of Miss Daisy Doran, who are at present taking care of the said child.
"After considering all of the papers in the case, and after hearing the returns and arguments of counsel…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brown v. RobertsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Whilden v. ChapmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- Busbee v. ReeseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- State v. PriceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
- Devereux v. McCradySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Henderson v. RiceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931