Mirman v. Webster

It will be noted that the order was made upon the “pleadings and statements of counsel” and that there is no bill of exceptions. We thus have no way of knowing what the statements were upon which the court acted.

It is contended that the defendant Mary Mirman was a minor at the time the note was signed, and that the judgment against her was therefore void, and that it was error for the court to refuse to permit her to show that fact.

Assuming that the judgment would be void for that reason, it will be noted that defendant’s answer said she was a minor under 21 years of age at the time the note…