Legal Opinion

Martin v. B.F. Goodrich Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 17, 1999No. 97-1518PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SNELL, Justice.

This is an interlocutory appeal from a district court order compelling defendant, B.F. Goodrich Company (BFG), to produce documents or information it claims are not in its possession, custody or control. Upon review, we conclude that the record does not support a finding of control sufficient to induce discovery. We reverse the district court order and remand for further proceedings.

I. Background Facts and Procedural History

In October of 1993, plaintiff, Albert Leroy Martin, requested that a used sixteen-inch B.F. Goodrich tire be mounted onto what he mistakenly believed to be…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Harry F. Chaveriat, Jr. v. Williams Pipe Line CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  3. Searock, D/B/A Allied Marine v. Greg Stripling, Counter-Claimant-Appellant, Amf Inc., D/B/A Hatteras Yachts and Aetna Insurance Co., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  4. Compagnie Francaise d'Assurance Pour le Commerce Exterieur v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  5. Gerling International Insurance Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Appeal of Gerling International Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Exotica Botanicals, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API