Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Sellhausen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2012No. 2010AP445-CRPublished

1ConcurrenceShirley S. Abrahamson, C.J.

¶ 43. {concurring). I write to discuss Justice Ziegler's concurrence in the present case. The concurrence contains many uncontroversial statements, which all the Justices can support.

¶ 44. We can all agree that a circuit court "has broad inherent authority" to "fairly, efficiently, and *305effectively administer justice."1 We can all agree that in accordance with this authority, a circuit court has discretion to remove jurors who are biased. We can all agree that it is preferable that immediate family members of a presiding circuit court judge not sit on the jury.2 We can all agree that a close…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Loy v. BundersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. Jerrell C.J.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. HenleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. CrochiereWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. TodyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API