State v. Sellhausen
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceShirley S. Abrahamson, C.J.
¶ 43. {concurring). I write to discuss Justice Ziegler's concurrence in the present case. The concurrence contains many uncontroversial statements, which all the Justices can support.
¶ 44. We can all agree that a circuit court "has broad inherent authority" to "fairly, efficiently, and *305effectively administer justice."1 We can all agree that in accordance with this authority, a circuit court has discretion to remove jurors who are biased. We can all agree that it is preferable that immediate family members of a presiding circuit court judge not sit on the jury.2 We can all agree that a close…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Loy v. BundersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. Jerrell C.J.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. HenleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. CrochiereWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. TodyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.