Legal Opinion

O'Connor v. Ralph Thrift, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 30, 1981No. C79-7-81, CA 17688Published

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

In an action for personal injury arising out of an intersection collision in Gold Beach, defendants obtained a jury verdict. The trial court denied plaintiffs motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, but allowed her motion for a new trial. In her motion for a new trial, plaintiff contended that there was no evidence from which the jury could return a verdict for defendants and that the court erred in failing to take their contributory negligence defense from the jury. Her motion for a new trial was nothing more than a restatement of her motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hess v. LarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Huettl v. HuettlOregon Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API