Alexander v. Holmes

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Since the special demurrers are not argued in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, they are treated as abandoned. As to the general demurrer, it is contended that the petition was deficient in not alleging notice of the homestead on the part of the levying officer and the defendants. On the question of notice, the following is alleged: “4. (b) The officer levying said distress warrant entered the aforesaid apartment and removed a portion of the household goods of petitioner, and put the same in the possession of said agent, (c) Petitioner…