Hathaway v. . Town of Homer
New York Court of Appeals
This action was brought for the recovery of moneys claimed.to have been received by defendant, for the use of the town of Solon, from the Paymaster-General of the State, for excess of years of service of men furnished by the town of Solon, pursuant to the call of the President of July 18, 1864, by virtue of section 2 of chapter 29 of the Laws of 1865, which provided for the refunding of local bounties paid by towns, cities or counties.
Read the full summary
This action was brought for the recovery of moneys claimed.to have been received by defendant, for the use of the town of Solon, from the Paymaster-General of the State, for excess of years of service of men furnished by the town of Solon, pursuant to the call of the President of July 18, 1864, by virtue of section 2 of chapter 29 of the Laws of 1865, which provided for the refunding of local bounties paid by towns, cities or counties. The supervisors of the county of Cortland, by resolution, authorized its county committee to secure the reimbursement to the county and the several towns…
1Opinion of the Court
Lott, Ch. C.,
reads for reversal and new trial.
All concur; Reynolds, C., not sitting.
Judgment reversed.
2Cited by9 opinions
- City of Norfolk v. Norfolk CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
- Hathaway v. . Town of CincinnatusNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Welch v. . PolleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Decker v. . SaltzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Webb v. MyersNew York Supreme Court · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.