M'Daniel v. Sappington

Opinion op the Court. — -The court think ⅛ unnecessary to notice all the errors that are manifest in the records and proceedings in this cause, as assigned by the attorney for the plaintiff in error.

It may be sufficient to observe, that an attachment being a remedy in derogation of the common law, the statute (b) giving this remedy ought therefore to be strictly pursued in all its provisions.‡

The court conceive there is error in this, that the attachment does not run in the name of the common-, wealth, a constitutional requisition which we cannot in such cases as the present dispense with.

2nd.…