Crawford & Company v. Apfel
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge:
The merits of this appeal present a novel issue of first impression under Title II, 42 U.S.C. § 405, of the Social Security Act (Act) and its applicable regulations, 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.932 and 416.1432. 1 The merits of the federal law issue presented in this case are juxtaposed against the backdrop of a state statute, Florida’s Workers’ Compensation Law, Fla. Stat. Ch. 440 (1994).
The Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner) appeals from an eighteen-word handwritten order of the district court. By this squib notation, written in the left-hand margin of the report and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Franz v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020
- Williams v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2010