Romero v. Administrative Office of the Courts

OPINION AND ORDER

I. INTRODUCTION

Movants are freelance court interpreters who seek review of “Supreme Court Amended Order 2004-3,” 1 which made substantial changes to the procedures of the Kentucky Court of Justice (“KCOJ”) concerning the appointment of court interpreters. Movants request that the amended order be set aside because they claim that it was entered without notification to them and thus “violates the Constitutional rights of Movants to Due Process.” We hold that because Movants, as freelance court Interpreters, only had a mere expectancy in continued employment as court…