Legal Opinion

State v. Fields

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 2001No. E1998-00388-SC-R11-CDPublishedCited by 129 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · BarkerBarker, J.

in which ANDERSON, C.J., BIRCH, and HOLDER, JJ., joined.

The issue raised on this appeal is whether the defendant’s conviction of the Class C felony of facilitation of an illegal drug transaction within 200 yards of a school overcomes the presumption in favor of alternative sentencing so as to justify a sentence of confinement. The trial court and the Court of Criminal Appeals found confinement necessary to avoid depreciating the seriousness of the offense. We conclude that the evidence presented is insufficient to overcome the presumption of alternative sentencing. Therefore, we…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HooperTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. DykesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  3. State v. PikeTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. MartinTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. HudsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by129 opinions

  1. State v. VasquesTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. DycusTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State of Tennessee v. Stanley Bernard GibsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Billy Lee Simmons v. David A. Sexton, WardenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
  5. State of Tennessee v. Aaron T. BinkleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2005

124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API