Legal Opinion

United States v. Greater New York Live Poultry Chamber of Commerce

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 5, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

This motion is granted.

I. As none of the parties saw fit to enter any formal order embodying the views expressed by Judge Bondy in his opinion, handed down herein on August 9, 1930, 44 E.(2d) 393, 394, admirably discussed in a Recent Case Note in volume XLIV of the Harvard Law Review, at page 997, his labors have not matured into a judicial act, and therefore I feel free to deal with the motion now brought before me, which in effect is made in pursuance of Judge Bondy’s suggestion.

II. This motion to strike out is directed against the denials of conspiracy in separate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peacock v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
  2. American Surety Co. v. SandbergDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1915
  3. United States v. Greater New York Live Poultry Chamber of CommerceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Commodore Tilden v. Frank J. Pate, Warden, Illinois State Penitentiary, Joliet, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  3. United States v. National City Lines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1953
  4. Securities and Exchange Commission v. CodyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
  5. United States v. Greater New York Live Poultry Chamber of CommerceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API