Legal Opinion

Parish v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 3, 1911No. 2,095PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Florida. Action at law by the United States against W. L. Parish and the Consolidated Naval Stores Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, Circuit Judge.

This was an action by the United States, plaintiff, against W. L. Parish and the Consolidated Naval Stores Company, a corporation, defendants. The declaration charged, in the first count, that the defendants had converted to their own use and deprived plaintiff of the use, possession, and value of plaintiff’s goods and! chattels — that is to say, turpentine and rosin — to the value of $455. The second count is to the same effect, except it describes the goods as crude gum, the product of pine trees, of the value, etc.; and the third count charges that the defendants…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wooden-Ware Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Shiver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. United States v. TaylorUnited States Circuit Court · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Liberty Bell Gold Mining Co. v. Smuggler-Union Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
  2. Union Naval Stores Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1913
  3. McKenzie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API