Legal Opinion
Ex parte Daugherty
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided May 31, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDREW M. J. COCHRAN,
District Judge for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Kentucky, sitting by .designation in the Southern'District of Ohio, Western Division. By the designation of myself to hear this cause, there has been thrust upon me the inescapable duty of passing upon the validity of certain action of the United States Senate. This cause involves a controversy between two individuals. It has come about by one of them restraining the other of his liberty and the latter applying to this court for discharge therefrom. The legality of the restraint depends upon the validity of such action. On April…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kilbourn v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Anderson v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- In Re ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Henry v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- People, Ex Rel. McDonald v. . KeelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McGrain v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Donald Trump v. Mazars USA, LLPCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Donald Trump v. Mazars USA, LLPCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Shelby v. Second National Bank, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County1933
- Trump v. Mazars USA, LLPSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.