Legal Opinion

Hitchcock v. Herzer

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1878PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Peoria county; the Hon. J. W. Cochean, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bakee

It is the settled and long established rule in this State, that a motion to set aside a default is addressed to the sound legal discretion of the court in which it is made, and that unless there has been a palpable abuse of such discretion the appellate courts will not interfere. It is only where it is evident the action of the court below has been unjust and oppressive, and has resulted in a substantial injury to the appellant, that such action will be reversed on review. Greenleaf v. Roe, 17 Ill. 474; Union Hide and Leather Co. v. Woodley, 75 id, 436; Constantine v. Wells, 83 id. 192.

An…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mason v. McNamaraIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Greenleaf v. RoeIllinois Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Dann v. GumbinerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  2. Russ v. GilbertSupreme Court of Florida · 1882
  3. Busser v. NobleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  4. Copper King v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Bradley v. Progressive Metal & Refining Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1917

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API