Legal Opinion
Lavine v. Jessup
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 6, 1959No. Civ. 23786PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
This is an appeal from orders which (1) denied plaintiff’s motion to strike defendants’ cost bill on appeal and (2) disallowed “counter-costs” on appeal incurred by plaintiff. Pointing to certain preliminary successes achieved by him on the appeal in the main case prior to its disposition on the merits, plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in failing to make an equitable, or any, apportionment of the costs he claimed were incurred. A careful review of the history of the within litigation and the record before us, convinces us that there is no merit to his position.
On January 19,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lavine v. JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Lavine v. JessupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Falk v. FalkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Markwort v. McGeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Weck v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Acree v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Harmon v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Regents of the University of California v. MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- San Bernardino Community Hospital v. MeeksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Ramirez v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.