Legal Opinion

Dorsey v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 3, 1979No. Appeal, No. 1839 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Wilkinson, Jr.,

This is an appeal by Petitioner (claimant) from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) finding that the claimant was ineligible for benefits pursuant to Section 401(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law), Act of December 5,1936, Special Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §801(d). We affirm.

Claimant seeks benefits for a period during which she was on a pregnancy leave of absence from her position as a service representative with Bell Tele*481phone Company of Pennsylvania. The record is clear that she elected to take a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walker v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Fessman EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. SmithCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carter v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Petty v. University of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  3. Cicco v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Estate of Fells ex rel. Boulding v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Northern Health Facilities v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API