Legal Opinion

United States v. Turner

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 5, 2008No. 07-3107PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.

Dissenting Opinion by Circuit Judge TATEL.

RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge:

The main issue in this appeal from a conviction, after a jury trial, is whether the sentence imposed on the defendant, Peter R. Turner, violated the Ex Post Facto Clause of the Constitution. U.S. Const. art. I, § 9. Turner also raises the question whether the prosecution established his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The evidence, viewed in favor of the verdict, shows that there was sufficient evidence to support his conviction.

In 1998, while serving as a volunteer driver…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Peugh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. United States v. WhitfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. DeeganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. RiggiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API