Legal Opinion

Hoshor v. Hoshor

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1998No. S-96-1317PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.

The marriage of Patricia A. Hoshor and Jim A. Hoshor was dissolved in 1982 pursuant to a consent decree. The decree pro vides that “[the wife] should receive one-fourth of any payments received from the pension and retirement plan by [the husband] at the time such payments are received.” In 1996, the wife filed an application for entry of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO), authorizing the plan administrator to distribute one-fourth of the husband’s pension payments to her. The husband filed a responsive pleading to the application, objecting to the requested QDRO. The husband…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. DeVaux v. DeVauxNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Meyers v. MeyersNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Tyler v. TylerNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Bonge v. County of MadisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Priest v. PriestNebraska Supreme Court · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Harris v. HarrisNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Blaine v. BlaineNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Riggs v. RiggsNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Rhoades v. RhoadesNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Reinsch v. ReinschNebraska Supreme Court · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API