Newlon v. Teck American, Inc.
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wheat
¶1 Teck American Incorporated (Teck) appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment of the Montana Workers’ Compensation Court (WCC), finding that Nick Newlon was entitled to medical benefits related to injuries sustained while working for Teck, that Newlon’s claim was not barred due to a superseding intervening cause, that Teck was estopped from asserting the 60-month time bar under § 39-71-704(l)(d), MCA (1991), and that Newlon’s claim was not barred by a statute of limitations or statue of repose. We affirm.
ISSUES
¶2 We have restated the dispositive issues as follows:
1.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arrowhead Sch. Dist. 75, Park Co. v. KlyapMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- In re T.E.Montana Supreme Court · 2002
- Ophus v. FritzMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- Wiard v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
- Winter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Westview v. Lockhart & Greener MT v. CunninghamMontana Supreme Court · 2023
- Westview v. Lockhart & Greener MT v. CunninghamMontana Supreme Court · 2023
- Hayashi v. FileDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2022
- Waddell v. StuderMontana Supreme Court · 2025