Legal Opinion

Gelfand v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided June 30, 2014No. Case No. 13-CV-1290 (PJS/JJK)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge.

Plaintiff Michael H. Gelfand participated in an employee welfare benefit plan (“the Plan”) sponsored by his employer, defendant Citadel Broadcasting Company (“Citadel”),1 and established pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”) insures the Plan. Gelfand brings this lawsuit seeking review of MetLife’s decision to deny his claim for long-term disability benefits under the Plan. Gelfand also seeks equitable relief from MetLife, Citadel, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Braden v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  5. LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. Principal Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
  2. Gary Grant Hampton, Jr. v. J. MoralesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API