Legal Opinion

Antoniades & Mitrou v. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 15, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODDARD, District Judge.

It seems to me that this amended complaint does allege an agreement by the parties to enter into a joint adventure. In paragraphs 8,11, and 19, it is in substance alleged that the agreement was entered into subject to such modifications as might be mutually determined upon, and further that it was agreed that other details which had not then been decided should be later, and that failure to agree upon them should not affect the obligations of the respective parties jointly to carry out the venture. In regard to the contention of defendant that plaintiff has failed to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re TaubCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wooten v. MarshallDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  2. Lord v. Pathe News, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API