Legal Opinion

Despain v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 24, 2018No. CR–17–470PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Lastly, Despain presented the testimony of Dr. James Moneypenny. Dr. Moneypenny testified that he had reviewed the literature on adolescent brain development and opined that Despain had the brain development of a 13- to 14-year-old and, while not intellectually stunted, was immature in his development.6

In addition to the evidence from Despain, the court received evidence from the Arkansas State Police. Investigator Louis Imsler testified regarding his investigation, the incriminating statements given by *617Despain and Taylor, and the search of Despain's home as outlined above.

After the hearing,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Magana-Galdamez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  2. C.B. v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  3. J.S. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  4. R.W.G. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
  5. R.W.G. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Keaton Taylor v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API