Legal Opinion

Woods v. Benson Hotel Corp.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided September 7, 1948No. Civ. No. 2628PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, Chief Judge.

These motions may be considered together, although it does appear that some of the stipulated facts upon which plaintiff bases his motion were only entered into “for the purpose of deciding whether to grant or deny each party’s motion for ’a preliminary injunction.” In any event, the admissions in the pleadings and the stipulated facts are the admitted basis for determining whether the injunction granted upon those factual grounds should now be set aside. A recital of some of the facts and circumstances which apparently caused the Court to grant the temporary injunction…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walker Memorial Baptist Church, Inc. v. SaundersNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Benson Hotel Corporation v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
  3. United States v. WeisenbloomCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Woods v. Benson Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
  2. Thomas v. County Office Committee of Cameron CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1971
  3. Bray v. PeckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  4. Butler v. KrizanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1949
  5. Walden Bros. Lumber, Inc. v. WigginCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API