Legal Opinion

People v. Pittman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 21, 2014PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The court providently exercised its discretion in declining to grant defendant a downward departure to level one (see People v Cintron, 12 NY3d 60, 70 [2009], cert denied 558 US 1011 [2009]; People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 568 n 2 [2009]). The risk assessment instrument adequately took into account the absence of a prior sex crime and defendant’s prison record. Further, neither defendant’s age (late 40s) nor any of the other factors he relied on warranted a downward departure in light of the seriousness of his offense against two very young children (see e.g. People v Thomas, 105 AD3d 640 [1st…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. MingoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. People v. KnoxNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. ColemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API