Legal Opinion

Morra v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 11, 1984No. Nos. 83-270, 83-1440PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

A defendant on bond who inconvenienced the court, a jury venire, and witnesses by not appearing on the date of trial, but who was surrendered by the surety to the custody of authorities within thirty days of the trial date and was subsequently tried and convicted, has not “thwarted the proper prosecution of the defendant” as that term is used in sections 903.26(5)(c) and 903.-28(2), Florida Statutes (1983). See Allied Bonding Agency, Inc. v. State, 358 So.2d 246 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978) (not every disappearance of a defendant thwarts prosecution even though it causes delay). Here a timely motion…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Allied Bonding Agency, Inc. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. BOARD OF COM'RS v. Barber Bonding AgencyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API