Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Hamilton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 6, 1987No. 86-648PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This Court has reviewed the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals, 520 So.2d 155, reviewed the petition, examined the record, studied the briefs, and heard oral argument. After this consideration, the Court holds that the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals must be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

All the Justices concur.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Daniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  2. Burgin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  3. Davidson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  4. Summerlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  5. Bradley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API