Legal Opinion

General Electric Co. v. Industrial Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 27, 1984No. 4—84—0107WC through 4—84—0109WC, 4-84-0111WC through 4-84-0114WC consPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kasserman

Petitioner, Marjorie Dixon, filed an application for adjustment of her claim under the Workers’ Compensation Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 48, par. 138.1 et seq.) for injuries suffered while she was employed by respondent, General Electric Company (General Electric). An arbitrator awarded benefits for temporary total disability, finding that Dixon’s condition had not yet reached permanency. The Industrial Commission set aside the arbitrator’s award and substituted in its stead, inter alia, an award for a more lengthy period of temporary total disability and an award for the permanent and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Certi-Serve, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. International Harvester Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Laclede Steel Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Steiner v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  2. Darling v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. ZION-BENTON TP. HS DIST. v. Industrial Com'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Electro-Motive Division v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. Zion-Benton Township High School District 126 v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API