Legal Opinion

Pacesetter Corp. v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 9, 1994No. WD 48877PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANNA, Presiding Judge.

The Pacesetter Corporation (Pacesetter) appeals a decision by the Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) which determined that Steven Frie-deck (claimant), formerly employed by Pacesetter, was entitled to wage credits for a prior period of employment. The issue on appeal is whether the services performed by claimant were those of a “direct seller” as defined in § 288.034.12(16), RSMo Supp.1993, and therefore not “employment.”

The facts are undisputed. From April 3, 1989 through May 15, 1989, the claimant performed services for Pacesetter as a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Garden View Care Center, Inc. v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Crawford v. Industrial CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Beal v. Industrial CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Mid-Continent Aerial Sprayers, Inc. v. Industrial Commission, Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Pioneer Potato Co. v. Division of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Safety Roofing Systems, Inc. v. CrawfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. STATE EX REL. SAFETY ROOF. SYS. v. CrawfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API