Atlanta Transit System Inc. v. Allen

Bell, Jfidge.

'-‘-‘The function of the motion for judgmerit' non obstante veredicto-is not the-same as that of a-motion for a new trial, but is a' summary method of disposing of the entire litigation where it is obvious that the-party against whom the motion is' directed cannot under any circuiris-tances Win his case.” McClelland v. Carmichael Tile Co., 94 Ga. App. 645 (96 S. E. 2d 202). If the evidence Authorised the verdict the motion should be overruled. City Council of Augusta v. Hood, 95 Ga. App. 259 (97 S. E. 2d 639). In Echols v. Thompson, 211 Ga. 299, 303 (85 S. E. 2d 423) the…