Legal Opinion

Sutherland v. Aolean Development Corp.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 14, 1987PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The defendant landowner (Aolean) has appealed from an order of a Superior Court judge, entered pursuant to G. L. c. 184, § 15, as amended by St. 1985, c. 809, allowing the plaintiffs to record a memorandum of lis pendens against certain property in a subdivision in Hopkinton. At the heart of the appeal is a dispute as to the scope of a judge’s function in determining, in the words of § 15, “if the subject matter of the action constitutes a claim of a right to title to real property.” If it does constitute such a claim, § 15 directs the judge to make a “finding” to that effect and to endorse…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Packaging Industries Group, Inc. v. CheneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Debral Realty, Inc. v. DiChiaraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. GormallyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  2. Maglione v. BancBoston Mortgage Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
  3. Speleos v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
  4. Fafard Real Estate & Development Corp. v. Metro-Boston Broadcasting, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  5. McCarthy v. HurleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API