Sutherland v. Aolean Development Corp.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
The defendant landowner (Aolean) has appealed from an order of a Superior Court judge, entered pursuant to G. L. c. 184, § 15, as amended by St. 1985, c. 809, allowing the plaintiffs to record a memorandum of lis pendens against certain property in a subdivision in Hopkinton. At the heart of the appeal is a dispute as to the scope of a judge’s function in determining, in the words of § 15, “if the subject matter of the action constitutes a claim of a right to title to real property.” If it does constitute such a claim, § 15 directs the judge to make a “finding” to that effect and to endorse…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Packaging Industries Group, Inc. v. CheneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Debral Realty, Inc. v. DiChiaraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
3Cited by19 opinions
- Wolfe v. GormallyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Maglione v. BancBoston Mortgage Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
- Speleos v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- Fafard Real Estate & Development Corp. v. Metro-Boston Broadcasting, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- McCarthy v. HurleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.