Bridge Proprietors v. Hoboken Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
68 U.S. 116 (1863)
1 Wall. 116
THE BRIDGE PROPRIETORS
v.
THE HOBOKEN COMPANY.
Supreme Court of United States.
Mr. Bradley and Mr. Gilchrist for the Hoboken Company.
Mr. Zabriskie for the Bridge Proprietors.
2Opinion of the Court · MillerJustice Miller
The first point arising in the case is that which relates to the jurisdiction of this court to review the decision of the State court of New Jersey. This is a question which this court has always looked into in this class of cases, whether the point be raised by counsel or not; but here it is much pressed, and we proceed to examine it.
It is asserted by the plaintiffs in error, that the validity of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Jefferson Branch Bank v. SkellySupreme Court of the United States · 1862
- Mohawk Bridge Co. v. Utica & Schenectady Rail RoadNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
- ARMSTRONG v. the Treasurer of Athens CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1842
4Cited by78 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. BondurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Stone v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Spencer v. MerchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.