Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Notey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 21, 1980Published

1Dissent

Damiani, J. (dissenting).

Although I realize that my dissent can have no practical effect in this case, since the Court of Appeals lacks the power to review the appropriateness of a discretionary sentence (People v Speiser, 277 NY 342, 344; People v Gittelson, 18 NY2d 427), I must dissent and vote to affirm.

It is my conviction that in reviewing the propriety of the sentence imposed in a particular case, it is not the function of appellate Judges to substitute their judgment as to the propriety of the sentence for that of the Judge at Criminal Term, *286upon whom the primary sentencing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. WallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. DittmarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  3. People v. JuncoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  4. People v. CaputoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  5. People v. SpeiserNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API