Legal Opinion

Bristow v. Pagano

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 11, 1947No. 47130PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHats, J.

Action for specific performance of a real estate contract between plaintiff-vendor and defendant-vendee. Defendant refused performance contending the title, as submitted, js not merchantable. The trial court held otherwise, ordered specific performance, and defendant appeals.

While the case is triable de novo, it being in equity, the facts are not in dispute. The questions raised on this appeal are strictly legal. The real estate involved is described, as “Lot 94 in Capitol Heights, No. 2, an Official Plat in Polk County, Iowa. ’ ’ On September 1, 1941, title to said property appears in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Smith v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Buchan v. German American Land Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Smith v. HuberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  4. Snapp v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  5. Hynds v. City of Ada Ex Rel. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Woods v. SchmittSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  2. Lucas v. Pioneer, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  3. Tesdell v. HanesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  4. Holliday v. ArthurSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  5. Gibbons v. BeltSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API