Legal Opinion · Dissent

Summers v. Crestview Apartments

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 2010No. DA 09-0489Published

1DissentJustice Rice

¶48 Although I agree that the attorney fee provision violates statute, I disagree with the Court’s analysis of the remaining issues, particularly the holding that a residential rental agreement, under no circumstances, may contain a mutually agreed upon acceleration clause, and the ultimate holding which voids the entire agreement.

*137¶49 In taking up the issues here, we would do well to remember that the freedom to contract is a constitutional right. U.S. Const, art. I, § 10, cl. 1; Mont. Const, art. II, § 31. An analysis of the validity of contract provisions under governing statutes is…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Kenneth Wayne BeckCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  2. Parada v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Iwen v. U.S. West DirectMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Iwen v. US West DirectMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Pelphrey v. Cobb County, Ga.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API