Legal Opinion

Browning v. Maurice B. Levien & Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1980No. 7826SC761PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

The plaintiffs have alleged that the action was brought “on their own behalf and, in the alternative, derivatively on behalf of the Partnership.” We deal first with the question of whether the plaintiffs may bring this action on behalf of the limited partnership. We hold they may not. G.S. 59-26 provides:

A contributor, unless he is a general partner, is not a proper party to proceedings by or against a partnership, ex cept where the object is to enforce a limited partner’s right against or liability to the partnership.

Both general partners are now bankrupt so that the limited…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davidson & Jones, Inc. v. County of New HanoverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Shoffner Industries, Inc. v. W. B. Lloyd Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Howard v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  4. McKinney Drilling Co. v. Nello L. Teer Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Howell v. FisherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Quail Hollow East Condominium Association v. Donald J. Scholz Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Bell v. JonesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Alva v. CloningerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Allright Missouri, Inc. v. BilleterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API