Legal Opinion

State v. Hill

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1938No. 8810PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatcher, Judge:

This writ of error involves the reception and construction of a verdict and the amendment of a court order. The record contains only the indictment, instructions and court orders. The indictment charged defendants with “feloniously, unlawfully and maliciously” wounding Watson Phillips in pursuance of a conspiracy to inflict bodily injury on him. An instruction (seemingly given for defendants) informed the jury that if no conspiracy was found, then, under the indictment, the jury could find one of the following verdicts, “as the evidence in the case may justify: first, malicious…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dwight v. HazlettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Burnett v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  3. State v. DavisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. State v. HokeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. State v. WestfallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HuffmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. State Ex Rel. Grob v. BlairWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. DavisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State v. RunnionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. State v. LaskeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API