Legal Opinion

Winograd v. Neiman Marcus Group

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 4, 2004Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant third-party plaintiff Neiman Marcus Group appeals (1), as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the *456Supreme Court, Westchester County (Jamieson, J.), entered October 15, 2003, as granted the motion of the third-party defendant, Tony Aversa, doing business as Aversa Landscaping and Masonry, for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint, and granted that branch of the cross motion of the defendants Simon Property Group, Inc., and Fashion Mall Partners which was for summary judgment dismissing its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kirkpatrick v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Maldonado v. MateraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Zoutman v. Goshen Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API