Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Schwartz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 19, 1983No. 82-2282Published

1DissentJustice McGLOON

I respectfully dissent from that part of my colleagues’ opinion regarding the interpretation and construction of the will.

The primary goal of construing a will is determining the intent of the testator. (In re Estate of Rettig (1981), 100 Ill. App. 3d 653, 427 N.E.2d 235.) Intent is generally ascertained from the language of the will (Rettig) and every word, phrase and clause should be given effect. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. Bailey (1982), 104 Ill. App. 3d 1131, 433 N.E.2d 1098. wellyn (1966), 67 Ill. App. 2d 171, 214 N.E.2d 471.) “[W]hen the word ‘issue’ is used in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Arnold v. AldenIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Rosenthal v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Continental Illinois National Bank & Co. v. BaileyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. Continental Illinois National Bank v. LlewellynAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  5. In Re Estate of RettigAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API