Legal Opinion
United States v. Day
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided December 1, 2008No. Criminal Action 3:08cr403PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD L. WILLIAMS, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the defendant’s motion to suppress. For the reasons stated below, the defendant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I. FACTS
On July 5, 2008, Officers Costa and Slader of the American Security Group were on duty at the Regency Lake apartment complex. They are both “armed security officers” with the power to arrest pursuant to Virginia Code Section 9.1-138 et seq. While patrolling, the officers noticed a gathering at 6464 Planet Road. Shortly after midnight, they observed individuals later…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- State v. SantiagoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- Anderson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2010
- United States v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010