Davison v. Patterson
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On rule to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Parker, J.
The relator as an honorably discharged soldier of the United States, having served as such in the war with Germany, claims the preferential right to appointment as borough clerk of the borough of Bed Bank, under the statute of 1919. Pamph. L., p. 290. There is little or no question about the regularity of his candidacy and application for the office. The mayor, whose duty it is to nominate to the office, under the Borough act, refused to nominate the relator on the ground that he did not consider him properly qualified to perform its duties.…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Resciniti v. Board Commissioners of BellevilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
- State ex rel. Troy v. BarnittSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Jones v. OrlandoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
- Joyce v. PriceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939