Legal Opinion

Adams v. Hygrade Food Products Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1957No. Docket 54, Calendar 46,931Published

1Opinion of the CourtDethmees, C. J.

The question is whether there is any competent evidence which, with reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom, supports thu finding of fact by the workmen’s compensation appeal board that plaintiff’s disabling disease is due to causes characteristic of and peculiar to defendant’s business and arose out of and in the course of his employment by defendant. If there is, we affirm. Neumeier v. City of Menominee, 293 Mich 646; Zythewick v. Ford Motor Company, 340 Mich 309. "We allowed appeal because the question is a close one, dividing the appeal board.

Defendant is in the meat-packing business.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mills v. Detroit Tuberculosis SanitariumMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Neumeier v. City of MenomineeMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. LaPorte v. Kalamazoo Stove & Furnace Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Zytkewick v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API