Setzer v. Deal.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
ActioN by Setzer & Russell against A. A. Deal, beard by Judge T. J. Slum and a jury, at November Term, 1903, of tbe Superior Court of Catawba County. Erom a judgment for tbe defendant tbe plaintiffs appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
All tbe evidence was to tbe effect that tbe defendant executed two notes to tbe Peering Harvester Company, one in tbe sum of $50 and the other in tbe sum of $55, for an “Ideal Binder,” sold by that company to him; that those notes were destroyed in tbe presence of tbe defendant by Yoder, and that thereupon tbe defendant executed tbe note sued upon in this action. Yoder claimed to be one of tbe firm of tbe Hickory Implement Company and testified that be endorsed tbe same to tbe plaintiffs for value. Tbe defendant attempted to prove that Yoder and tbe plaintiffs conspired to cheat…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Loftin v. Hill.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
3Cited by5 opinions
- Local Finance Company v. CharltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- Smith v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Standard Acceptance Corp. v. ChapinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Silberschmidt v. MoranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Salem Trading & Finance Co. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1927