Legal Opinion
Lynch v. Metropolitan Utilities District
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided May 23, 1974No. 39290PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCown, J.
This is an action by plaintiff, as representative of a class, against the Metropolitan Utilities District, Ne*18braska Methodist Hospital, and the City of Omaha, seeking to quiet title to certain real property in the City of Omaha, and to obtain for the city a portion of the proceeds of the sale of certain real estate similarly acquired. The District Court quieted the title to certain portions of the property in the defendant, Nebraska Methodist Hospital; quieted the title to the remaining property in the defendant, Metropolitan Utilities District; and dismissed plaintiff’s petition and the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- City of Fremont v. Dodge CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
- City of Millard v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1970
- Keystone Investment Co. v. Metropolitan Utilities DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
- Hargleroad Bulk Carriers, Inc. v. Ruan Transport Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brookins v. Sargent Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Clyde Brookins v. Sargent Industries, Inc., a California Corporation, Garwood Division of Sargent Industries of Delaware, Inc., an Alabama Corporation, Sargent Industries of Delaware, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and National Disposal Service of Nebraska, Inc., a Nebraska Corporation, Flora M. Brookins v. Sargent Industries, Inc., a California Corporation, Garwood Division of Sargent Industries of Delaware, Inc., an Alabama Corporation, Sargent Industries of Delaware, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and National Disposal Service of Nebraska, Inc., a Nebraska CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Lynch v. Metropolitan Utilities DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1974