Legal Opinion

Leo v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 17, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Leo was indicted on several charges of aggravated rape, breaking and entering, and larceny. At his arraignment, a judge in the Superior Court set bail in the amount of $5,000,000, with surety, or $500,000 cash, without prejudice. See G. L. c. 276, § 57. The following month, a hearing was held before a second judge on Leo’s request to reduce his bail to $200,000, with surety, or $20,000 cash. The judge refused to reduce the bail on the sole basis that Leo posed a suicide risk, and thus presented a flight risk. Several months later, Leo again sought a reduction in his bail in the Superior…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Mark JessupCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  2. Querubin v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  3. Commesso v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. United States v. Nelson Mantecon-ZayasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  5. Cresta v. EisenstadtDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brangan v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
  2. Carrington v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  3. Leo v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  4. Barbosa v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API