Legal Opinion

In re Rowland

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1902PublishedCited by 7 opinions

An original proceeding in Supreme Court for writ of habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the Court

QDARLES, C. 3.

— The petitioner applies for a writ of habeas corpus, and in his petition it appears that he was arrested upon a warrant which issued out of the justice’s court of West Moscow precinct, in Latah county, on a criminal complaint *596charging petitioner- as follows: “That the said Charles Bowers, 'John Jackson, Roe Sudreth, Burt (Will) Rowland, and George 'Jackson, at the county of Latah, state of Idaho, on or about the 10th day of September, 1902, then and there being, did then and there willfully and unlawfully engage in, deal, carry on, and play a game with cards called ‘stud…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. MulkeyIdaho Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Ex parte Ah YemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pepple v. HeadrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Rasmussen v. Zundel, Sheriff, Etc.Utah Supreme Court · 1926
  3. In re MillerIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  4. In re BurgessIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  5. In re MillerIdaho Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API