Legal Opinion
Ross v. Louise Wise Services, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 12, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Barbara R. Kapnick, J.
Plaintiffs Arthur Ross and Dr. Barbara Ross seek to recover compensatory and punitive damages against defendant Louise Wise Services, Inc., a licensed New York adoption agency during *281the relevant time period, for: (i) wrongful adoption and fraud (first cause of action); (ii) negligence and breach of fiduciary duty (second cause of action); and (iii) intentional infliction of emotional distress (third cause of action).
Plaintiffs claim that defendant agreed in 1960 to represent them in the adoption of “a healthy baby from a normal, healthy family” but…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zoe G. v. Frederick F. G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- East Midtown Plaza Housing Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Bani-Esraili v. LermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Jeffrey BB. v. Cardinal McCloskey School & Home for ChildrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Juman v. Louise Wise ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- RUSO v. MorrisonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Sarfati v. Antigua and BarbudaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Ross v. Louise Wise Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006